<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Grammar 101: Much Ado About Many</title>
	<atom:link href="http://btr.michaelkwan.com/2009/07/02/grammar-101-much-and-many/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://btr.michaelkwan.com/2009/07/02/grammar-101-much-and-many/</link>
	<description>Freelance Writing, Personal Development, and Making Money with Freelance Writer Michael Kwan</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:38:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grammar 101: There, Their, and They&#8217;re &#171; Beyond the Rhetoric</title>
		<link>http://btr.michaelkwan.com/2009/07/02/grammar-101-much-and-many/#comment-68977</link>
		<dc:creator>Grammar 101: There, Their, and They&#8217;re &#171; Beyond the Rhetoric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 18:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://btr.michaelkwan.com/?p=5644#comment-68977</guid>
		<description>[...] this edition of Grammar 101, we consider a suggestion from Shawn Knight, the same guy who won my E3 swag contest last month. This also happens to be one [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this edition of Grammar 101, we consider a suggestion from Shawn Knight, the same guy who won my E3 swag contest last month. This also happens to be one [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn Knight</title>
		<link>http://btr.michaelkwan.com/2009/07/02/grammar-101-much-and-many/#comment-68954</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn Knight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 07:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://btr.michaelkwan.com/?p=5644#comment-68954</guid>
		<description>I could see a post on to / too / two being useful as well as there / their.  I see both of these confused all the time online, even on some &#039;professional&#039; sites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could see a post on to / too / two being useful as well as there / their.  I see both of these confused all the time online, even on some &#8216;professional&#8217; sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray Ebersole</title>
		<link>http://btr.michaelkwan.com/2009/07/02/grammar-101-much-and-many/#comment-68913</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray Ebersole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 13:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://btr.michaelkwan.com/?p=5644#comment-68913</guid>
		<description>Muchly, could become part of the lexicon if it was used like Rachel Ray has used EVOO or Sammie for her food.

Not that I see a use for any of it, every year a catch work that someone coins and everyone wants to use. As humans we are just too influenced by PR.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Muchly, could become part of the lexicon if it was used like Rachel Ray has used EVOO or Sammie for her food.</p>
<p>Not that I see a use for any of it, every year a catch work that someone coins and everyone wants to use. As humans we are just too influenced by PR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dcr</title>
		<link>http://btr.michaelkwan.com/2009/07/02/grammar-101-much-and-many/#comment-68890</link>
		<dc:creator>dcr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 01:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://btr.michaelkwan.com/?p=5644#comment-68890</guid>
		<description>Muchly can be a word if we keep using it and get it to catch on.  ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Muchly can be a word if we keep using it and get it to catch on.  <img src='http://btr.michaelkwan.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Kwan</title>
		<link>http://btr.michaelkwan.com/2009/07/02/grammar-101-much-and-many/#comment-68889</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Kwan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 21:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://btr.michaelkwan.com/?p=5644#comment-68889</guid>
		<description>&quot;Thank you very much.&quot; Since that is perfectly acceptable, I&#039;d say that &quot;Thanks much&quot; is equally acceptable, albeit on a more casual level. The first time I heard &quot;thank you muchly&quot; was in Animal Crossing. Muchly is not a word. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Thank you very much.&#8221; Since that is perfectly acceptable, I&#8217;d say that &#8220;Thanks much&#8221; is equally acceptable, albeit on a more casual level. The first time I heard &#8220;thank you muchly&#8221; was in Animal Crossing. Muchly is not a word. <img src='http://btr.michaelkwan.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lesley</title>
		<link>http://btr.michaelkwan.com/2009/07/02/grammar-101-much-and-many/#comment-68888</link>
		<dc:creator>Lesley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 20:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://btr.michaelkwan.com/?p=5644#comment-68888</guid>
		<description>Thank you muchly!

I say that a lot. &quot;Thanks much&quot;, as well. Is that wrong? Or is it just slang?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you muchly!</p>
<p>I say that a lot. &#8220;Thanks much&#8221;, as well. Is that wrong? Or is it just slang?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dcr</title>
		<link>http://btr.michaelkwan.com/2009/07/02/grammar-101-much-and-many/#comment-68886</link>
		<dc:creator>dcr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 18:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://btr.michaelkwan.com/?p=5644#comment-68886</guid>
		<description>Much thanks!  ;-)

I wonder when the use of &quot;success&quot; as quantifiable noun became obsolete.  One of the definitions for success was outcome, or desirable income.  For example, you could have many military successes.  You could have three military successes.

There was also the use of the term to describe a person.  You could say that Donald Trump is a success.  You could have a room full of successful people and say that it was a room full of successes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much thanks!  <img src='http://btr.michaelkwan.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I wonder when the use of &#8220;success&#8221; as quantifiable noun became obsolete.  One of the definitions for success was outcome, or desirable income.  For example, you could have many military successes.  You could have three military successes.</p>
<p>There was also the use of the term to describe a person.  You could say that Donald Trump is a success.  You could have a room full of successful people and say that it was a room full of successes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

