At least it seems that way.

On Sunday, I wrote a post listing 10 things I hate about Vancouver. Having been born and raised in this city, it’s easy to pick out countless items to dislike about my hometown, but I narrowed it down to ten things that stuck out most prominently in my mind. And then it started to pick up steam.

The post was included in a speedlink from Beyond Robson and then it got picked up on StumbleUpon late yesterday. There hasn’t been a huge flood of traffic, but the post has certainly been more popular than many other posts that I have written on Beyond the Rhetoric. It’s been way more popular than the post I wrote on why I love Vancouver. The “hate” post is getting more comments and eliciting more emotion from readers.

This wasn’t really the original intention. Instead, I just wanted to present a sense of balance, because there’s no way that I love everything about Vancouver. After all, I talk a lot about balance, whether it be the life-work balance or finding the balance between success and happiness. By showing both sides of the equation, readers are better equipped to make their own decisions.

Now, it’s probably not a good idea to write a “negative” post just because you feel like writing a negative post, but it seems that they are more likely to grab the attention of readers than posts that are more conventional and more positive. It’s also important that your post doesn’t come off sounding just like a rant. A coherent, organized argument is ultimately much more effective than an emotion-filled rant.

Whatever the case, have you experienced a similar phenomenon on your blog?